Alcohol and drugs · easy
What does Colorado's express consent law mean for a driver who is lawfully arrested for impaired driving?
- A The driver may refuse any test without consequence
- B By driving on Colorado roads the driver has already consented to a chemical test of breath or blood, and refusing carries licence consequences Correct
- C The driver may choose which test to take, but only after a court hearing
- D The driver must give written consent at the scene before any test may be given
Why B is correct
Express consent is a condition attached to the privilege of driving rather than a decision made at the roadside. In Colorado, anyone who drives on public roads is deemed to have already agreed that a lawful arrest for impaired driving brings with it a chemical test of breath or blood. Refusing does not end the matter: the refusal starts its own administrative process against the licence, separate from anything a criminal court does, and prosecutors may use the refusal as evidence. The practical effect is that the choice at the scene is between taking the test or losing driving privileges for refusing it, and neither option erases the arrest itself.
Why the other options are wrong
- A. The driver may refuse any test without consequence
- Refusal has never been consequence-free. Because consent was given in advance by the act of driving, refusing triggers administrative licence action on its own and can be treated as evidence of consciousness of impairment.
- C. The driver may choose which test to take, but only after a court hearing
- Choosing between breath and blood is an administrative detail handled at the testing location, not a right exercised at a hearing. The decision that actually matters — whether to submit to testing at all — has consequences either way.
- D. The driver must give written consent at the scene before any test may be given
- Nothing requires a signature before testing. Written consent at the scene misunderstands the word express: the consent is deemed to have been granted when the driver chose to use Colorado roads, not when paperwork is signed.
On the road
A driver arrested after weaving across the centre line refuses the breath test, believing refusal protects them. Instead the refusal begins a licence revocation of its own that runs regardless of what happens in the criminal case, and it becomes something a prosecutor can point to later.
Similar questions
- Driving on Medication: When It Counts as Impairment
Which statement best describes driving after taking medication that makes you drowsy?
- Same Drinks, Different BAC: Why | CO
Two drivers drink the same number of standard drinks over the same evening and end up with noticeably different blood alcohol concentrations. Which factor best explains the difference?
- Coffee Will Not Sober You Up | CO
A driver who feels impaired decides to drink strong coffee, take a cold shower and get some fresh air before driving home. What actually happens to their blood alcohol?
- What Counts as One Standard Drink | CO
Which statement correctly reflects what counts as roughly the same amount of pure alcohol?
- Impairment Starts Before the Limit | CO
Which statement best describes how alcohol affects driving well before a driver approaches the legal blood alcohol limit?
Sources
- Section referenced: Colorado Driver Handbook — Alcohol, Drugs and Driving; Express Consent
- Colorado Driver Handbook, January 2025 (DR 2337) — English PDF · Spanish PDF
- Retrieved 2026-10-17 from Colorado Division of Motor Vehicles
Every question on this page is written in our own words and is not copied from the handbook. Reviewed by Ethan Wen on 2026-10-17.